United - sezon 2011/2012

[michal85]

W ostatnich tygodniach też graliśmy 442 jak niszczyliśmy Wigan, czy Fulham. Na początku sezonu było fajnie z grą do przodu, ale w tyłach dawaliśmy za dużo swobody rywalom. Po meczu z City się to zmieniło o czym wspominał niejeden z naszych.

Jeszcze raz wspomnę fragment z fajnego bloga o United

Cytat:Central midfield

This could be a blog entry in itself. The thing to make clear is there is no obvious answer – the midfield lacks imagination but then it also lacks bite. I’ve blogged before on why I believe grit and balls should come before creativity – and then suggested a solution. In short; just because other sides play a ‘creative’ CM (note in a 4-5-1) that doesn’t mean we have to follow their lead. United’s midfield has traditionally been built upon winning the ball and being effective; allowing the wide players and forwards to take the lead on more creative parts of the game.

It seems incredible that United entered into a game, let alone a Champions League game with a 19 year old centre back and a 38 year old former winger as the central midfield pairing. Even so, United created 22 chances away from home and scored one goal; similar to the 29 created vs. Newcastle recently. So to what extent is the problem in the central midfield area anyway? The lack of movement up front isn’t a central midfield issue and seemingly neither is creating chances.

However there is real klout to having someone like Carrick available. He, like Parker and Lucas is somewhat unfancied because he’s limited in the final third of the pitch. Yet his ability to help prevent goals being conceded is just as vital as being able to create goalscoring chances as I shall explain…

Trzeba się z tym pogodzić, że grając 442(4411) żaden z CMów nie będzie miał tyle swobody co ten 'kreatywny' w 433(451). Gramy obecnie jako nieliczni z czołówki europejskiej dwoma napastnikami i ktoś musi na nich pracować. Nie możemy o tym zapominać

Fakt jednak faktem, że w razie kontuzji Carricka jesteśmy w dupie.